![]() Please use Chrome, Edge, FireFox, or Safari. A federal judge on Thursday rejected Jeff Bezos’ latest legal attempt to overturn NASA’s multibillion-dollar moon lander contract with Elon Musk’s SpaceX.The decision ended a monthslong. Internet Explorer is not supported by this website. “There will be forthcoming opportunities for companies to partner with NASA in establishing a long-term human presence at the Moon under the agency’s Artemis program,” the space agency said in a statement on the ruling.The Army Lawyer 2021 Issue 1 - The Judge Advocate General's Legal Center & School - TJAGLCS Still, Bezos argued that NASA would be better served by funding both SpaceX and Blue Origins plans to develop vehicles capable of landing on the moon. ![]() With Hertling’s ruling, NASA says that work on SpaceX’s lunar lander can resume “as soon as possible.” ![]() SpaceX’s bid came in at about $2.9 billion, less than half of Blue Origin’s $5.99 billion bid. There had been hints that cost may have been a factor in NASA’s decision to select only SpaceX. A federal US judge has rejected a lawsuit by Jeff Bezos space company Blue Origin against the American government over NASAs decision to award a US2.9 billion lunar lander contract to rival. On Thursday, Judge Richard Hertling dismissed (Opens in a new. lawmakers weighed in by proposing an amendment to a bill that would have added $10.03 billion to NASA’s budget and allow for the selection of two proposals as previously planned. 4 (UPI) - A federal judge on Thursday threw out Blue Origin s latest legal attempt to block SpaceX s 2.9 billion lunar lander contract from NASA. Federal Court of Claims on Wednesday released a redacted version of the lawsuit by Jeff Bezos ’ Blue Origin against NASA over the lucrative lunar lander contract awarded to Elon. After a federal judge ruled against Blue Origins lawsuit seeking to over the NASA. A federal judge has shot down Blue Origin’s lawsuit to stop NASA from awarding a 2.9 billion lunar lander contract to rival SpaceX. The legal wrangling has officially held up work on NASA’s lunar lander. for each of the lunar programs described in the previous sentence and funding. The GAO ruled that NASA had not made any error in its selection process.īlue Origin filed its lawsuit against NASA soon afterward. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall require that all contracts of the. Soon after the final down-select, Blue Origin and Dynetics both filed complaints with the Government Accountability Office (GAO). ![]() Blue Origin and Dynetics had also been in the running. EDT Jeff Bezos, founder of Amazon and Blue Origin and owner of The Washington Post. ![]() SpaceX had submitted a Starship-derived lunar lander that may have been vaguely reminiscent of some retro artwork of crewed lunar missions from before even the Apollo lunar landings. Court of Federal Claims ruled against Jeff Bezos’ Blue Origin in the company’s lawsuit versus NASA over a lucrative astronaut lunar lander contract awarded to Elon Musk’s SpaceX. Judge releases redacted lunar lander lawsuit from Bezos Blue Origin against NASA-SpaceX contract. By Christian Davenport Updated Novemat 1:49 p.m. The court has yet to make Judge Hertlings. Hertling rejected Blue Origins lawsuit over a NASA moon lander contract. Three proposals had still been in the running before NASA selected SpaceX for the exclusive contract. According to the Wall Street Journal, Federal Claims Judge Richard A. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |